Hole 9
Hole 7
Hole 8
Tony A.
May 13, 2022
This is by far my favorite 9 hole course in Indy. The greens and fairways are well maintained and the rest of the course is just beautiful! The courses name "Buffer" acts as a buffer between the city and the landfill. The staff is amazingly nice and helpful and the clubhouse has a nice vibe.
Read MoreAlexandra B.
Jul 24, 2021
Great place for a round of 9 or 18! Well maintained course and very nice staff. It was about a 20 minute drive from downtown and has lots of parking. We were able to reserve a tee time that morning for the afternoon. Prices were fair - about $22 a person for 9. Great for social players who just want to get out and have fun! I will definitely be back!
Read MoreNick L.
Apr 4, 2009
Buffer Park is a nice 9 hole course. It is a links style course that was built as part of a land reclamation project. This is an enjoyable course to play. It plays wide open, with well shaped fairways that funnel good shots toward the greens. Very nice well maintained fairways. The last par 3 is a very challenging water shot that is nearly perfectly set up as a risk/reward hole. In short, a well-designed and fun course to play.
Read MoreDan R.
Nov 30, 2023
Friendly staff. Best 9 hole course I've been to in central Indiana. Very well maintained. Inexpensive greens fees. Great spot to play 9 or 18!
Read MoreWes J.
Jul 8, 2023
Great 9 hole course. One of the better courses in the city in my opinion. Course is VERY well kept.
Read MoreLogan B.
Aug 25, 2021
So disappointed I have not been here sooner. The course was absolutely beautiful. The course felt very secluded, I could hardly tell it was located near/inside 465. The staff was outstanding. We got rained out today so the staff gave us our next round free. I can't wait to go back.
Read MoreTom B.
Feb 11, 2020
It's a 9 hole course in an industrial area on the edge of a landfill, so giving above a 3 didn't cross my mind. However, it has a convenient location and a tolerable, if mostly uninspiring layout, with reasonable prices, so it deserves better than a 2. Probably a 2.8 if we could give decimal ratings
Read More